lovely-luxray:

libertarian–princess:

pissbabyanarchist:

libertarian–princess:

pissbabyanarchist:

libertarian–princess:

pissbabyanarchist:

libertarian–princess:

64bitwar:

libertarian–princess:

it’s too bad most of humanity won’t ¯_(ツ)_/¯

But what if we force them to through anarchic rule?

ACCEPT THE NON-AGGRESSION PRINCIPLE OR WE WILL AGGRESSIVELY FORCE YOU TO

Aren’t you like a classic liberal at best?

nah according to like ¾ of the anarchists on here i’m a FASCIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIST

But you’re somewhere between classic liberal and modern conservative correct?

Let’s go over this, shall we? Starting from the top, do I think the government should do the following…

  • Energy: Fuck no
  • Clothing: Fuck no
  • Housing: Fuck no
  • Food: Fuck no
  • Universal healthcare: Fuck no
  • Unemployment insurance: No
  • Retirement insurance: No
  • Limited healthcare: No
  • Safety net: I can understand it on the state/municipal level, but not federal; I’d vastly prefer charities and NGOs to do it but I think individual states would be within their constitutional right to implement it should they so please
  • Education: Absolutely fucking not
  • Fire protection: Yes, and is actually included in some definitions of minarchism
  • Roads: Yes, for same reason as fire protection, although I’m okay with privately built roads
  • Police: Yes, and I’m okay with private police too
  • Military: Yes, and I’m okay with PMCs too
  • Courts: Yes
  • Anarcho mumbo jumbo up there about voluntary transactions: Yes! The principle described in the chart is perfectly possible under a minarchist state because a minimal government would keep the hell out of voluntary transactions between individuals

Doesn’t that out you exactly where I said? Between classic liberal and modern conservative? Since you believe in all the tents of classic liberal and a very limited safety net?

As I said, minarchism includes those classical liberal tenants (read: classical liberalism as described above falls under minarchism), and I don’t support safety nets, I simply said they’re constitutional at the state level and I can understand the rationale behind them. Understanding something is not approving of it.

So, no, I’m a minarchist through and through.

Hmm, I’ll rate myself

Energy: NOPE

Clothing: NOPE

Housing: NOPE

Food: NOPE

Universal Healthcare: NOPE

Unemployment Insurance: I think it should be the choice of a business

Retirement Insurance: Yes

Limited Healthcare (For senior’s and poor): Yes

Limited Housing, Food, Energy (Poor/Safety Net): Only food

Education: Yes, but it should be done through state level government. Common Core and federal governmental intervention has not worked whatsoever

Fire Protection: Yes

Roads: Duh

Police/Military/Courts: Yep

Anything anarchist: NOPE

Only food? A safety net should provide as much as it fucking needs to but have the intention of getting people back on their feet.

National expectations for education should exist. I can’t understand thinking otherwise, not to say Common Core is good.