I’m gonna be real here, I take neurotypicals’ opinions on “weird” people far more seriously than I take their statements of support for me or for autistic people in general.
Like your opinions on furries (putting aside any sexual connotations) are HONESTLY a better litmus test of whether you are a safe person for me or any autistic people than your opinions on Five Year Old Boy Disease.
let me explain…
No one would think it was funny to bully an Autistic Child™, and you don’t think bullying Autistic Children™ is funny! That’s horrible! But when I say that story about a “weird kid” you knew that got bullied isn’t funny, you’re like “Well…that’s different! She was really weird, I mean she MEOWED at people!”
…bruh
Apparently it’s straight up “forget there’s 24 hours in a day” hours
You reblogged the post. That means you support positivity towards straight and cis people.
Deadass imagine being like this.
Deadass imagine being such a sad person that you have to hate on a positivity post
sorry but why would I,as a trans gay man, give positivity to my goddamn oppressors. What kind of backwards shit bye.
I’m a bi girl and positivity isn’t exclusive to “oppressed” people
cissy don’t speak over me lmao. you have no idea what oppression really is if you think oppressors deserve my time for me to suck up to them.
It’s not sucking up to anybody. Cis and straight people have problems just like the rest of us. Mental illness, physical illness, abuse, sexual assault, rape, poverty? These things know no sexual orientation or gender. Nobody lives a perfect life. So yeah, everybody deserves positivity.
okay please go tell that to the people in third world countries who literally get killed, tortured and arrested for being gay or trans.
I literally didn’t compare straight and cis problems to the problems of people in the third world. Yeah, those people obviously have it worse, but that doesn’t make being a first world victim of rape or mental illness any less hard. I don’t know what point you’re trying to make?
point is straight cis people literally murder and abuse our people for no benefit at all so literally why the fuck would lgbt people praise cishets for anything when they’re killing us.
Imagine being this embarrassing
OKAY LITERALLY BUT LIKE LITERALLY LITERALLY LITERALLY I’M BEING LIKE LITERALLY OPPRESSED BY LITERALLY EVERY ONE OF YOU LITERALLY LITERAAAALLLYYYYYYYY
Why should I be punished for something I didn’t do?
It’s the same reason why anyone who’s lgbt cannot be even friends with cishets.
Us vs them mentality whether we like it or not. Because even those of us that actually aren’t entitled pieces of shit, we have to hate them because we need to be angry because one straight person called someone who’s gay a faggot and we now need to hate every cishet ever.
It’s the exact same logic racists and sexists use.
I don’t want to miss a second day of school this week but I have a fever and my stomach isn’t feeling the best.
But what if we force them to through anarchic rule?
ACCEPT THE NON-AGGRESSION PRINCIPLE OR WE WILL AGGRESSIVELY FORCE YOU TO
Aren’t you like a classic liberal at best?
nah according to like ¾ of the anarchists on here i’m a FASCIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIST
But you’re somewhere between classic liberal and modern conservative correct?
Let’s go over this, shall we? Starting from the top, do I think the government should do the following…
Energy: Fuck no
Clothing: Fuck no
Housing: Fuck no
Food: Fuck no
Universal healthcare: Fuck no
Unemployment insurance: No
Retirement insurance: No
Limited healthcare: No
Safety net: I can understand it on the state/municipal level, but not federal; I’d vastly prefer charities and NGOs to do it but I think individual states would be within their constitutional right to implement it should they so please
Roads: Yes, for same reason as fire protection, although I’m okay with privately built roads
Police: Yes, and I’m okay with private police too
Military: Yes, and I’m okay with PMCs too
Courts: Yes
Anarcho mumbo jumbo up there about voluntary transactions: Yes! The principle described in the chart is perfectly possible under a minarchist state because a minimal government would keep the hell out of voluntary transactions between individuals
Doesn’t that out you exactly where I said? Between classic liberal and modern conservative? Since you believe in all the tents of classic liberal and a very limited safety net?
As I said, minarchism includes those classical liberal tenants (read: classical liberalism as described above falls under minarchism), and I don’t support safety nets, I simply said they’re constitutional at the state level and I can understand the rationale behind them. Understanding something is not approving of it.
So, no, I’m a minarchist through and through.
Hmm, I’ll rate myself
Energy: NOPE
Clothing: NOPE
Housing: NOPE
Food: NOPE
Universal Healthcare: NOPE
Unemployment Insurance: I think it should be the choice of a business
Retirement Insurance: Yes
Limited Healthcare (For senior’s and poor): Yes
Limited Housing, Food, Energy (Poor/Safety Net): Only food
Education: Yes, but it should be done through state level government. Common Core and federal governmental intervention has not worked whatsoever
Fire Protection: Yes
Roads: Duh
Police/Military/Courts: Yep
Anything anarchist: NOPE
Only food? A safety net should provide as much as it fucking needs to but have the intention of getting people back on their feet.
National expectations for education should exist. I can’t understand thinking otherwise, not to say Common Core is good.
ifesbob 